home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: interramp.com!usenet
- From: mattn@engdns.bandley1.netmanage.com
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,alt.wired,alt.religion.scientology,alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.duke3d,alt.games.descent,alt.flame,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.cyberspace,alt.cracks,alt.crackers,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.bigfoot,alt.2600
- Subject: Re: NT or 95?
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 96 11:33:32
- Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link
- Message-ID: <NEWTNews.829247679.2005.mattn@mattn.bandley1.netmanage.com>
- References: <3161C78E.478D@hydro.on.ca> <4kc4lk$m8@news.wco.com> <4kfsnu$7s3@hp01.redwood.nl> <316C4EC8.400E@emi.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.27.10.96
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- X-Newsreader: NEWTNews & Chameleon -- TCP/IP for MS Windows from NetManage
-
-
- In Article<316C4EC8.400E@emi.net>, <orlo@emi.net> writes:
- >
- > Fidelio wrote:
- > >
- > > LewM@PacX.Com (Lewis Mettler) writes:
- > >
- > > >Lisa Wang <lisa.wang@hydro.on.ca> wrote:
- > >
- > > >If you want to go slow use NT.
- > >
- > > >If you want unreliable operation use 95.
- > >
- > > >If you rather go fast and be reliable you will have to use OS/2.
- > >
- > > Fast and reliable, that sounds like Linux to me. Going fast until it
- > > suddenly crashes, with no applications to run, not supporting the most
- > > common hardware, that's OS/2.
- > >
- >
- > But, the question is...Can I load Win NT in a Win 95 directory? Will both
- > OS's be operational on my HD?
-
- ...sounds like a job for "System Commander"... :)
-
- -Matt
-
-
-
-